The first three days of August saw unusual action in the gaming rooms of the Four Queens in Las Vegas, Nevada.
No, we're not talking about Blackjack or Texas Hold'Em, though we're sure there was plenty of action of that type elsewhere in the casino.
Nery Cardenas and Ryan Pronk; Tom Jones and John Cardie
We're talking about the 2005 edition of the American Checker Federation 9th District Tournament, organized by California checker stalwart Gerry Lopez. A small but enthusiastic group of players gathered in the City of Entertainment for some serious cross-board action.
Competition took place in two divisions, with these final results:
A Division
| Ranking | Name | State | Points | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Gerry Lopez | CA | 10 | 2005 Cal. and Dist. 9 Champion |
| 2. | Nery Cardenas | CA | 8 | |
| 3. | Ryan Pronk | AZ | 4 | withdrew |
| 4. | Bob Murr | CO | 2 |
| Ranking | Name | State | Points | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | John Gibson | CA | 20 | |
| 2. | Alex Lopez | CA | 18 | first tourney |
| 3. | John Cardie | CO | 16 | first tourney |
| 4. | Robert Ferguson | UT | 14 | first tourney |
| 5. | Tom Jones | NV | 8 | first tourney |
| 6. | Paul Stein | CA | 4 | |
| 7. | Joe Coleman | IA | 2 |

| [Event "9th District 2005 Round 2 Game 1"] | |
| [Date "2005-08-01"] | |
| [Red "Ryan Pronk"] | |
| [White "Bob Murr"] | |
| [Result "0-1"] | |
| 1. 11-16 23-18 | 2. 7-11 26-23 |
| 3. 3-7 30-26 | 4. 16-19 (A) 23x16 |
| 5. 12x19 24x15 | 6. 10x19 27-24 |
| 7. 7-10 24x15 | 8. 10x19 32-27 |
| 9. 9-14 18x9 | 10. 5x14 27-23 |
| 11. 11-16 22-18 | 12. 6-9 18-15 |
| 13. 8-12 (B) 25-22 | 14. 16-20 23x16 |
| 15. 12x19 15-11 | 16. 20-24 22-17 |
| 17. 14-18 26-22 | 18. 18x25 29x22 |
| 19. 19-23 28x19 | 20. 9-13 17-14 |
| 21. 23-26 (D) 19-15 (E) | 22. 26-30 22-18 |
| 23. 30-25 14-10 | 24. 25-22 10-7 |
| 25. 4-8 11x4 | 26. 2x11 15x8 |
| 27. 22x15 8-3 (F) | 28. 15-11 31-26 |
| 29. 1-6 26-22 | 30. 11-15 4-8 |
| 31. 15-10 8-11 | 32. 10-14 3-7 |
Division A Game 2
Notes by Ryan Pronk

| [Event "9th District 2005 Round 1 Game 1"] | |
| [Date "2005-08-01"] | |
| [Red "Ryan Pronk"] | |
| [White "Nery Cardenas"] | |
| [Result "1/2-1/2"] | |
| 1. 11-16 21-17 | 2. 9-14 (A) 17-13 (B) |
| 3. 16-19 (C) 23x16 | 4. 12x19 24x15 |
| 5. 10x19 25-21 | 6. 8-11 27-23 |
| 7. 6-10 23x16 | 8. 11x20 26-23 (D) |
| 9. 14-17 (E) 21x14 | 10. 10x26 31x22 |
| 11. 4-8 22-18 | 12. 8-11 29-25 |
| 13. 7-10 25-22 | 14. 10-14 18x9 |
| 15. 5x14 22-18 | 16. 14-17 23-19 |
| 17. 17-22 13-9! | 18. 1-5 (F) 18-14 |
| 19. 20-24 19-16 | 20. 11x20 28x19 |
| 21. 20-24 19-16 | 22. 3-7 16-12 |
| 23. 7-11 12-8 | 24. 11-15 8-3 |
| 25. 15-18 3-8 | 26. 18-23 8-11 |
| 27. 24-27 11-15 | 28. 27-31 15-18 (G) |
| 29. 22-26 18x27 | 30. 31x24 30x23 |
| 31. 24-27 23-18 | 32. 27-23 18-15 |
| 33. 23-18 15-11 | 34. 18-22 |
Division B Game 1

| [Event "9th District 2005 Round 6 Game 1"] | |
| [Date "2005-08-02"] | |
| [Red "Robert Ferguson"] | |
| [White "John Cardie"] | |
| [Result "0-1"] | |
| 1. 10-14 22-18 | 2. 11-15 18x11 |
| 3. 8x15 24-19 | 4. 15x24 28x19 |
| 5. 7-11 25-22 (A) | 6. 3-8 (B) 22-18 (C) |
| 7. 6-10 19-15 | 8. 10x19 23x7 |
| 9. 2x11 27-23 (D) | 10. 1-6 (E) 29-25 (F) |
| 11. 6-10 (G) 25-22 | 12. 12-16 22-17 |
| 13. 9-13 18x9 | 14. 5x14 23-18 |
| 15. 13x22 18x9 | 16. 22-25 9-6 |
| 17. 25-29 21-17 | 18. 8-12 6-2 |
| 19. 10-15 17-14 | 20. 15-19 2-6 |
| 21. 4-8 14-10 | 22. 19-23 26x19 |
| 23. 16x23 10-7 | 24. 12-16 7-3 |
| 25. 8-12 3-8 | 26. 11-15 8-11 |
The Checker Maven congratulates Gerry Lopez for not only having organized this event, but taking home the District 9 and California championships!

Our thanks to Bob Murr for photos and games, Ryan Pronk for additional games, and Gerry Lopez for permission to publish.

We promised a "summer scorcher" of a stroke problem for August, and we think we've delivered with one that we're calling Eyes Only. When it originally appeared almost 100 years ago, the publication editor challenged readers to solve it by sight alone, without moving the pieces around on the board. The number of readers who reported success was rather small--- just one solitary correspondent claimed a victory.

When you either have the solution, or have had enough, click on Read More to learn the winning way.
[Read More]
The publication of the conclusion of our Did Marvin Blow the Game? story has been delayed a bit, as we're carefully editing the variations on the play of this interesting position. But never fear, you'll soon learn whether our hero Marvin prevailed, or if Louie Screwdriver got the last laugh.
Also, our on-line publication calendar has gotten out-of-date. Look for us to get that fixed up within the next week or so.
Thank you for helping to make The Checker Maven one of the world's most-read checker publications.
The Checker Maven is pleased to note that, following a period of controversy (see our previous editorial on this topic), eminent checker grandmaster Leo Levitt will be playing for the USA in the upcoming 100th Anniversary International Match with Great Britain.
More words are superfluous, so we will only say that the leadership of the American Checker Federation, spearheaded in this instance by Dr. Richard Beckwith, ACF President Alan Millhone, and Gerry Lopez, acted with honor in according Mr. Levitt the place on the United States team that he so richly deserves.
Congratulations and thanks are due all around to those who in the end upheld the best principles of our game. We recall Dr. Martin Luther King's famed expression, "It's always the right time to do the right thing" and we are proud that our ACF leaders did exactly that.... the right thing.

This month we're making good on our promise (or was it a threat?) to come up with speed problems that are much more challenging than the ones we've been offering so far. You're not likely to solve these at sprint speeds, hence this month's title caption!
Toe up to the starting line and click below to display the problems and start the clock. Good luck! You can check your solutions by clicking on Read More. Afterwards, click here to cast your vote for the type of speed problems you prefer.
(This article has been edited subsequent to original publication due to valuable reader input. As a result you have three problems instead of two!)
Problem One (very hard for a timed problem)
Problem Two (medium difficulty, original erroneous diagram corrected)
Problem Three (quite hard, as originally published)
[Read More]
We're making a small change to our publication schedule, partly in response to our recent reader survey. Readers thought our present once or twice a week publication schedule was fine, with most readers saying they visit the site more or less weekly.
So, in order to maintain consistency and predictability year-round, and to help manage our publication workload while still providing quality content, we're going to a permanent Saturday-morning schedule. We're dropping our Wednesday editions in favor of providing more on Saturdays.
This means that during summer and holiday periods, you'll still see a weekly Saturday article. During the regular parts of the year, you'll see at least one article and possibly two or three, as our time, energies, and backlog allow.
We hope this small change will prove pleasing, and invite your comments.
We spent a pleasant interval at our Honolulu office, where we made quite a bit of progress on our "electronic classics" projects. But now we're back in Santa Fe, and, lo and behold! The Santa Fe Opera performance season is in full swing!
Along with the Grand Old Game, there is little that is as wonderful as Grand Opera, performed by a truly world class company such as we are privileged to have here in Santa Fe.

Just a word of caution: today's problem is "grand" in terms of difficulty as well as content. If you solve it, congratulations --- you might wish to reward yourself with a front row seat at the Santa Fe Opera!
[Read More]One of the most asked-for items in our recent user survey was annotated games from recent events. We've earlier remarked that delivering on this will not be easy, and so we're looking for volunteer "stringers" among our readership and elsewhere.
Now, we know that up-to-the-minute tournament results and standings are generally posted on the Checker Solutions BBS (see link at left), or on specific websites. We're not looking to compete or "double up" in this area, and we're not looking to publish games, play, or analysis without proper permissions and clearances. We know that in a number of cases, game scores are kept in reserve for contributors.
However, having said all that, if you're in a position to provide us with timely news, play, or commentary from checker events, and doing so wouldn't be in conflict with what we've stated above, your contributions would be heartily welcomed. Full credit would be given, and in return you can have any share you want of our subscription fees. (Let's see, we learned in school that any number times zero is ....)
We hope to hear from you!
Our May Checker Maven Reader's Survey demonstrated to us the popularity of our electronic republications of classic checker literature, and contained suggestions to publish more as time permits. In response to these requests, we're inaugurating a new series that we're calling Checker School. This will, over time, amount to new electronic editions of Ben Boland's classics Famous Positions in the Game of Checkers, and Familiar Themes. These are seminal works that prove as valuable today as they did when they were published over six decades ago. Now, these books contain much complex material, so a complete reissue will likely take many months if not years, but we're working at it!
Let's get started with a delicate endgame of a very practical nature. Class is in session!

Click on Read More for the solution, a runup to the position, and additional notes and quotes from Famous Positions.
(Editor's Note: the color diagrams will return as soon as we work through our article backlog.)
[Read More]Here's the last of our "easier" stroke problems, at least in this series. Will you find this one to be a July cruiser, or something more? Solve it, check your solution by clicking Read More, and then prepare yourself --- next month's problem is going to be a summer scorcher.
