In one of Tom Wiswell's many fine books, Mr. Wiswell published a number of situations which he referred to as "checker brilliancies." We have to agree with him, as in these settings, the winning player invariably comes up with a move or a sequence that is, well, brilliant, both in concept and execution.
Today, we challenge you to match wits with James P. Reed, in a game played back in 1889 against Charles F. Barker. The move Mr. Wiswell calls "Barker's Blunder" allowed Mr. Reed to find an astounding win. Here's the run-up and the game position:
Black: | Charles F. Barker |
White: | James P. Reed |
10-14 | 22-17 |
7-10 | 17-13 |
3-7 | 25-22---A |
14-17 | 21-14 |
9-25 | 29-22 |
10-14---B | 24-19 |
6-10 | 22-18 |
14-17 | 27-24 |
1-6 | 19-15 |
10-19 | 24-15 |
12-16---C |
A---24-20 can be played here.
B---This move doesn't lose, but it could be argued that 11-15 or even 10-15 is better.
C---This is the "blunder" that loses.
W:W13,15,18,23,26,28,30,31,32:B2,4,5,6,7,8,11,16,17.
Can you match Mr. Reed for brilliance and find the winning move? We'll warn you, it's really something and takes a truly skilled player to find. How about correcting Mr. Barker's "blunder" and instead demonstrating a draw?
Work it out and then click on Read More to see if your play really shines.
Solutions
.... | 15-10---D |
6-22---E | 13-9 |
5-14 | 23-18 |
14-23 | 26-3 |
7-10 | 3-7 |
D---A truly amazing move. If you didn't see it, don't feel bad about it!
E---The alternative jump also loses: 7-14 18-9 6-14 23-18 14-23 26-3 White Wins.
Instead of 12-16 (the "Blunder") Willie Ryan (a brilliant player in his own right) demonstrated that Black should have played 6-9, leading to the following draw:
... | 6-9 |
13-6 | 2-9 |
23-19 | 9-13 |
26-23 | 17-22 |
28-24 | 13-17 |
24-20 | 5-9 |
30-26 | 9-13 |
32-28 | 22-25 |
15-10 | 7-14 |
18-9 | 11-16 |
20-11 | 8-24 |
28-19 | 25-30 |
9-6 | 4-8 |
19-15 | 12-16 |
23-19 |